News & Insights
Insights
- August 24, 2026: What the CFTC’s Latest Crypto Discussion Means for Investors and Regulated Market Participants
- August 14, 2026: CFTC Registration – Participating in Prediction Markets as an Introducing Broker or Futures Commission Merchant
- July 25, 2026: Chapter 21, Prediction Markets, of the 2026 edition of Regulation of Swaps and Security-Based Swaps in the United States
Press Releases
➞ NEW YORK / WASHINGTON, August 17, 2026: Tölt Strategies provided key regulatory, strategic role enabling Touchmark to launch Aug. 14 amid intense interest in new compute forward and futures markets
Tölt Strategies LLC, a leading regulatory strategy and compliance consulting firm, announced that it has played a key role in helping Touchmark Technologies, Inc. develop the necessary documentation and trading rules to support the platform’s nationwide launch that took place on Friday. Touchmark is building the market infrastructure for AI’s fastest-growing cost line – inference model compute capacity.
California-based Touchmark’s trading platform now enables commercial providers and buyers to enter into forward contracts for the delivery of tokens representing inference model compute capacity for the purpose of consuming the capacity in connection with the buyers’ commercial operations.
By planning ahead for months where an end user expects to spend money on AI inference capacity, it can manage its budget more efficiently without being subject to excess capacity in the months where its needs are less significant. A producer can sell capacity forward, collecting payment now for a buyer’s future usage.
Dorothy D. DeWitt, founder and CEO of Tölt Strategies and former Director of the Division of Market Oversight at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), said: “Tölt is all about helping clients smoothly navigate unchartered terrain, and we love helping them solve the regulatory, compliance and strategic challenges of novel concepts, markets and industries. We’re seeing extraordinary interest in the development of GPU compute capacity and infrastructure, with established and startup companies reaching out regularly to request advice on how to innovate responsibly and quickly in these novel markets. The GPU compute and inference capacity markets have the potential to become as large as longstanding energy markets, and we are well-positioned to support companies in developing them. We are honored to serve as strategic advisors to Touchmark on this innovative forward market that addresses commercial consumption needs at discounts to spot prices, while enabling providers to collect proceeds for future production.”
Touchmark Co-Founder and CEO Ilia Bolgov said: “The Tölt team understood our goals in launching a forward trading venue quickly and compliantly, allowing Touchmark to offer what we believe is the first trading venue matching buyers and sellers of AI inference capacity at forward prices that are discounted to the spot prices commercial buyers have been limited to.”
Touchmark Co-Founder Roman Yanushevskyi said: “Tölt has been creative and responsive in advising on our trading platform’s structure, consistent with our need for alacrity in launching. We look forward to continuing to work with Tölt as we grow and develop additional novel products that solve for challenges in the AI space.”
“Tölt advised Touchmark on a go-to-market strategy that is not only compliant with trading and markets regulation but also flexible and scalable,” DeWitt said.
About Tölt Strategies
Independent regulatory and advisory firm Tölt Strategies LLC, founded by Dorothy D. DeWitt, serves clients through a team of senior regulatory, operational, compliance and risk experts. The Tölt team provides strategic and operational advice to assist clients in meeting their goals in traditional as well as novel areas of trading and the markets. The firm utilizes time-tested regulatory solutions for innovative industries, bringing recent senior government experience combined with decades of private sector pragmatism. Services provided by Tölt include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), CFTC, and Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) registration and operation of exchanges, broker-dealers, clearinghouses, custodians, transfer agents, alternative trading systems (ATSs), and investment and trading advisors. Tölt supports clients in responsibly innovating by developing products and services related to novel markets such as GPU compute capacity, indices and infrastructure; perpetuals; tokenized real-world assets (RWAs); collateral and investment management on the blockchain; payment stablecoins and prediction markets. Tölt also supports market participants in traditional and new markets with operational and compliance testing, enhancements and remediation; product development; and strategic initiatives.
Media Contact for Tölt Strategies:
Ellen G. Resnick
Crystal Clear Communications
+1 312-399-9295 (mobile)
eresnick@crystalclearPR.com
➞ NEW YORK / WASHINGTON, August 5, 2026: Tölt Strategies instrumental in swift Novig regulatory approval leading to nationwide launch
With the nationwide launch of trading yesterday of Novig’s federally regulated sports prediction market exchange, Tölt Strategies LLC, a leading regulatory strategy and compliance consulting firm, announced its role in advising and assisting Novig in achieving its status from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a Designated Contract Market (DCM). Novig, through its wholly owned exchange, is now able to operate as a federally regulated prediction market, expanding nationwide under a single regulatory framework.
NEW YORK / WASHINGTON, Aug. 5, 2026 – With the nationwide launch of trading yesterday of Novig’s federally regulated sports prediction market exchange, Tölt Strategies LLC, a leading regulatory strategy and compliance consulting firm, announced its role in advising and assisting Novig in achieving its status from the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) as a Designated Contract Market (DCM). Novig, through its wholly owned exchange, is now able to operate as a federally regulated prediction market, expanding nationwide under a single regulatory framework.
Novig’s DCM application process and approval were among the fastest in CFTC history.
Dorothy D. DeWitt, founder and CEO of Tölt Strategies and former CFTC Director of the Division of Market Oversight overseeing registration and regulation of DCMs, said the Tölt team worked closely with Novig executives to recruit exceptional independent board members and staff; advise on building systems, processes, controls and staffing to comply with the CFTC requirements; introduce the team to the Commission; prepare and file the application, and respond to CFTC questions during the process. She said Tölt is proud to have introduced Novig to the exchange’s public board members – Gary DeWaal and Bonnie Litt – both seasoned experts in the law and regulation of futures who will play an ongoing role in governance of Novig.
Elie Mishory, Chief Regulatory and Legal Affairs Officer of Novig, said: “Dorothy and the Tölt team provided critical strategy, tactics, operational know-how and relationships that helped us get approved in record time as well as operate with best practices going forward. Their ability to speak the language of the CFTC and deep understanding of the nuances in this industry enabled us to put into place the processes, systems and governance that have positioned us for success as we embark on this new chapter.”
DeWitt said: “Congratulations to Novig on the launch of its DCM sports prediction marketplace. We were honored to play a role in its swift approval by the CFTC and introduction to partners that support the exchange in meeting its obligations. We laud Novig’s dedication to customer protection by limiting trading to those age 21 and older. Novig has achieved two critical and challenging milestones: achieving CFTC approval in record time, and thereafter successfully launching the exchange.”
About Tölt Strategies
Independent regulatory and advisory firm Tölt Strategies LLC, founded by Dorothy D. DeWitt, serves clients through a team of senior regulatory, operational, compliance and risk experts. The Tölt team provides strategic and operational advice to assist clients in meeting their goals in traditional as well as novel areas of trading and the markets. The firm utilizes time-tested regulatory solutions for innovative industries, bringing recent senior government experience combined with decades of private sector pragmatism. Services provided by Tölt include Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), CFTC, and Options Clearing Corporation (OCC) registration and operation of exchanges, broker-dealers, clearinghouses, custodians, transfer agents, alternative trading systems (ATSs), and investment and trading advisors. Tölt supports clients in responsibly innovating by developing products and services related to novel markets such as perpetuals, tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), payment stablecoins and prediction markets. Tölt also supports market participants in traditional markets with operational and compliance testing, enhancements and remediation; product development; and strategic initiatives.
About Novig
Novig is the leading sports prediction market, built to deliver the most transparent and efficient sports trading experience. Available nationwide, Novig gives fans a modern way to participate in the games they love through market-driven pricing designed around fairness and transparency.
Built to challenge outdated and exploitative systems, Novig eliminates unfair odds, and punitive limits on winning players, creating a market where incentives are aligned with participants. Designed by sports traders for sports traders, Novig is redefining sports trading for a new generation of fans.
For more information, visit Novig.com or follow Novig on X, Instagram or LinkedIn.
Media Contacts:
For Tölt Strategies:
Ellen G. Resnick
Crystal Clear Communications
+1 312-399-9295 (mobile)
eresnick@crystalclearPR.com
For Novig:
Michelle Isaacs
22 Spring
michelle@22-spring.com
Blog Posts
August 24, 2026: What the CFTC's Latest Crypto Discussion Means for Investors and Regulated Market Participants
The digital asset industry is at a turning point. For years, market participants have faced uncertainty because regulators relied more on enforcement actions than clear rules. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC)’s latest crypto discussion suggests that U.S. digital asset regulation may be moving toward a clearer framework.
During his opening Remarks at the CFTC Innovation Advisory Committee (IAC) Conference on August 20, 2026, Chairman Michael S. Selig emphasized:
“It’s not a question of whether innovations like blockchain, artificial intelligence, and prediction markets will transform our markets. It’s a question of where this innovation will take place and who will write the rules.”
His remarks covered crypto market structure, overlapping regulators, on-chain finance, prediction markets, and the limits of enforcement-based regulation. Congress still plays a key role, and Chairman Selig signaled that the CFTC may use its existing authority to create clearer rules if lawmakers do not act. Such action could create new opportunities for investors, crypto platforms, and traditional market participants that are ready to adapt.
A Shift Away From “Regulation by Enforcement”
One of the most significant themes at the meeting was the need to replace uncertainty with rules that market participants can understand before launching products or making investments.
Selig criticized the previous approach, saying businesses could not reliably determine in advance whether their activities were permissible because clear rules had not been established. For crypto companies, that uncertainty has affected product design, capital formation, market entry, and long-term planning.
Although legislative proposals such as the CLARITY Act remain under debate in Congress, the CFTC is not waiting. The CFTC’s emerging approach seems to give responsible businesses a more predictable path to compliance. That does not necessarily mean lighter regulation; it means regulation that is clearer, more tailored to crypto markets, and easier to incorporate into business decisions.
The chairman said he had directed CFTC staff to explore rules that could codify a crypto market structure using the agency’s existing authority. Under the concept described, current registrants and presently unregistered crypto exchanges could potentially receive designation as a type of Designated Contract Market (DCM) known as a “crypto asset market.”
The agency also acknowledged gaps beyond crypto. Selig noted that the CFTC has never instituted a comprehensive framework addressing the unique policy considerations associated with event contracts. That observation is especially relevant as prediction markets grow and increasingly intersect with retail trading, derivatives regulation, and state law.
What This Shift Means for Market Participants and Tech Leaders
Although important questions remain, the conversation is moving from whether crypto should be regulated toward how a workable market structure should operate.
- Clearer Rules Reduce Investor Uncertainty: Clearer rules could reduce uncertainty and make regulated digital asset markets more attractive to investors.
- Expansion of Regulated Venues: Such rules may also result in the development of more regulated venues with stronger governance, market surveillance, custody controls, and risk management standards.
- Institutional Capital Influx: The likely next step is greater participation by institutional investors, many of whom require clear regulatory accountability before committing significant capital or offering products to clients.
- Compliance as a Competitive Advantage: Compliance will become a competitive advantage rather than simply the cost of doing business. Firms that build strong controls early may be better positioned to secure approvals, form institutional partnerships, and scale. Firms that wait until requirements become compulsory may face expensive remediation, operational disruption, or even delayed market access.
A core theme of the IAC meeting was repatriating liquidity from offshore platforms to mitigate market manipulation, illicit finance, and VPN-driven circumvention risks. As the CFTC explores pathways under its Commodity Exchange Act authority to support domestic margined trading and perpetual contracts, offshore venues face increasing pressure to formalize U.S. operations.
How Tölt Strategies Can Help You Capitalize on the Changing Landscape
Navigating the journey from an unregulated platform or crypto startup to a fully regulated financial institution requires specialized expertise and strategic execution. At Tölt Strategies, we help market participants bridge this gap and capitalize on new regulatory frameworks.
Our tailored advisory and operational capabilities include:
- Registration Readiness: Evaluating the optimal registration category—such as Broker-Dealer (B/D), Introducing Broker (IB), Futures Commission Merchant (FCM), DCM, or Derivatives Clearing Organization (DCO) or Foreign Board of Trade (FBOT) registration under Part 48—and building actionable compliance roadmaps before rules become obligatory.
- Regulatory Gap Assessments: Reviewing existing operational frameworks against CFTC and Securities and Exchange Commission expectations, identifying critical gaps in governance, trade surveillance, Know Your Customer (KYC) / Anti-Money Laundering (AML) compliance, custody solutions, and risk management.
- Market Structure Advisory: Strategic guidance for crypto companies transitioning into regulated financial entities, as well as traditional financial institutions entering digital-asset markets.
- Licensing and Regulatory Strategy: Developing optimal regulatory paths, preparing formal applications, establishing policy and procedure frameworks, and creating examination readiness programs.
- Ongoing Managed Service Provider (MSP) Support: Helping regulated firms maintain compliance and ability to scale after approval.
Conclusion
The message from federal regulators is clear: digital asset innovation is here to stay, and the rules governing it are actively being written. As crypto markets become more regulated, firms that prepare now will be better positioned to compete. By taking proactive steps today, your firm can transform regulatory compliance into a durable competitive advantage.
To learn how Tölt Strategies can guide your institution through registration readiness and regulatory alignment, reach out to our team today at info@toltstrategies.com.
August 14, 2026: CFTC Registration – Participating in Prediction Markets as an Introducing Broker or Futures Commission Merchant
Introduction and Background
Interest in prediction markets, where participants trade contracts tied to the outcomes of real-world events, has grown significantly in recent years. From sports outcomes and political elections to economic data releases and weather events, these markets are attracting attention from entrepreneurs, financial professionals, technology innovators, and retail investors alike.
In the United States, prediction market contracts (or event contracts) are generally treated as commodity interests under the Commodity Exchange Act (CEA). As a result, many business activities involving these products require formal registration before the commencement of operations. Depending upon how you plan to participate in the prediction markets, you need to understand the registration requirements and related rules of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the National Futures Association (NFA). There are multiple pathways to participation. Choosing the right registration category can make all the difference in how you operate your business in compliance with the rules and regulations of the CFTC and NFA.
Unless you plan to launch your own trading platform, which may require registration as a Designated Contract Market (DCM) or a Swap Execution Facility (SEF), your business plan probably involves participation in existing platforms, either by introducing client trades to them, executing client trades on them, or advising clients on the prediction markets. The most common registration pathways for new entrants to the existing prediction markets space are the Introducing Broker (IB) and the Futures Commission Merchant (FCM). Two other registration categories that may be relevant to your business plan are the Commodity Trading Adviser (CTA) and the Commodity Pool Operator (CPO).
This guide will focus on the IB and FCM registration categories.
Introducing Broker
For many firms entering the prediction markets industry, registration as an IB offers the quickest and most practical path. The IB model allows businesses to build customer relationships and generate revenue without assuming the operational and financial responsibilities associated with holding customer funds or clearing trades.
An IB is authorized to solicit and accept customer orders for commodity interests, including prediction market contracts, and transmit those orders to a registered FCM for execution and clearing. This structure is well suited for firms that have an existing customer base or distribution channel.
Compared to other registration categories, the IB model offers several advantages for firms seeking to enter the market quickly and at low cost. Capital requirements are substantially lower than those applicable to FCMs, compliance obligations are more manageable, and the registration process is generally less complex. In addition, many of the industry’s most resource-intensive functions, including customer fund custody, trade clearing, and settlement, remain the responsibility of the FCM.
Compared to other registration categories, the IB model offers several advantages for firms seeking to enter the market quickly and at low cost. Capital requirements are substantially lower than those applicable to FCMs, compliance obligations are more manageable, and the registration process is generally less complex. In addition, many of the industry’s most resource-intensive functions, including customer fund custody, trade clearing, and settlement, remain the responsibility of the FCM.
Choosing Between a Guaranteed and Independent IB
There are two forms of IB registration, each with its own operational and financial considerations.
A Guaranteed IB operates under a formal guarantee agreement with a single registered FCM. Under this arrangement, the FCM guarantees the IB’s financial obligations arising from its brokerage activities and assumes responsibility for satisfying the applicable minimum adjusted net capital requirements. As a result, the Guaranteed IB is not required to maintain its own regulatory capital. This structure can be the preferred option for many start-up firms and businesses entering the regulated derivatives industry because it significantly reduces the financial burden of registration.
By contrast, an Independent IB operates without a guarantee agreement and therefore assumes direct responsibility for meeting all applicable financial requirements. Among other requirements, Independent IBs must maintain a minimum adjusted net capital of at least $45,000 on an ongoing basis and must comply with NFA financial reporting requirements. In exchange, they enjoy greater operational independence, including the flexibility to establish relationships that may not be available under a guaranteed arrangement.
The decision between these two models ultimately depends on a firm’s business strategy, available capital, and long-term objectives. Many organizations seeking to enter the prediction markets quickly may wish to begin as a Guaranteed IB before transitioning to a more independent structure as the business grows.
Futures Commission Merchant
For firms seeking a more comprehensive role in the prediction markets, registration as an FCM permits one to engage in a broader range of activities. Although the registration process and ongoing compliance obligations are significantly more demanding than those applicable to IBs, FCM registration enables a firm to offer customers integrated trading and clearing services under its own regulatory framework.
Unlike an IB, which refers customer business to another firm for execution and clearing, an FCM may accept customer orders, receive and safeguard customer funds, execute transactions on regulated markets, and clear those transactions. For firms entering the prediction markets industry, FCM registration is generally appropriate when the business model extends beyond customer acquisition and referral services. Organizations planning to maintain customer accounts, hold margin funds, and oversee trade execution and clearing will typically require FCM registration. An FCM may also establish relationships with multiple IBs, allowing it to support a broader network of customer-facing firms while centralizing custody, clearing, and risk management functions.
Because FCMs assume responsibility for customer assets and the integrity of the trading process, regulators impose substantially higher financial and operational standards than those applicable to IBs. FCMs must maintain sophisticated compliance programs, robust internal controls, and comprehensive supervisory systems designed to protect customers and promote market integrity. As a result, FCM registration is generally best suited for organizations with significant financial resources, experienced management, and the operational infrastructure necessary to support an enterprise-level compliance program.
One of the most significant distinctions between IB and FCM registration is the capital requirement. An FCM must maintain a minimum adjusted net capital equal to the greater of $1 million or eight percent of the total risk margin required for all customer and non-customer positions carried by the firm. These requirements reflect the heightened responsibility associated with safeguarding customer funds and managing the financial risks inherent in clearing derivatives transactions.
Organizations seeking a faster, more capital-efficient path into the prediction markets industry often begin as IBs, leveraging the infrastructure of an established FCM while building their customer base. Firms with the resources and long-term objective of operating an independent, full-service trading business may determine that pursuing FCM registration from the outset better aligns with their strategic plans.
The Registration Process: A Practical Roadmap
While the specific requirements for registering as an IB or FCM differ, the overall process is designed to require that firms are adequately capitalized, properly supervised, and prepared to operate within the CFTC’s regulatory framework before conducting business. Firms that invest time in planning, developing their compliance infrastructure, and assembling complete application materials are typically able to navigate the process far more efficiently than those that do not.
Step 1: Define Your Business Model
Before preparing an application, firms should determine whether they intend to introduce customer business to an existing FCM, accept and hold customer funds directly, operate a trading platform, or provide advisory services related to prediction markets. These strategic decisions will determine not only the appropriate registration category, yet also the firm’s regulatory obligations, capital requirements, and compliance responsibilities.
Step 2: Establish Your Compliance Infrastructure
Before approving a firm’s application, the NFA expects applicants to demonstrate that they have developed the policies, procedures, and supervisory systems necessary to operate as a regulated entity. This foundation typically includes:
Written supervisory procedures that describe how the firm will oversee its personnel and business activities, including how your firm handles customer complaints and addresses compliance with applicable regulations.
An Anti-Money Laundering (AML) program that satisfies the requirements of the Bank Secrecy Act (BSA), including Know Your Customer (KYC) procedures for customer onboarding.
Recordkeeping systems capable of meeting CFTC and NFA requirements.
A clearly defined supervisory structure with assigned compliance responsibilities, including the designation of a Chief Compliance Officer.
Step 3: Satisfy Financial Requirements
Guaranteed IBs generally satisfy their capital requirements through a formal guarantee agreement with a registered FCM, while Independent IBs must maintain the minimum adjusted net capital discussed previously. FCMs are subject to substantially higher capital standards reflecting their responsibility for holding customer funds and clearing transactions. In addition to regulatory capital, applicants should be prepared to satisfy other financial requirements that may apply to their registration category, including required security deposits, guarantees, and ongoing financial reporting obligations.
Step 4: Complete Required Proficiency Requirements
Individuals who solicit customers or supervise solicitation activities generally must demonstrate an appropriate level of knowledge of the derivatives markets before registration. For most applicants, this requirement is satisfied by completing the Series 3 National Commodity Futures Examination. The examination covers the fundamentals of the futures markets, applicable CFTC and NFA regulations, and the responsibilities associated with conducting regulated derivatives business. Individuals who solicit customers or supervise solicitation activities with respect to event contracts that have been designated as swaps are required to pass the NFA’s Swaps Proficiency Requirements exam.
Step 5: Prepare and Submit the Registration Application
Registration applications are submitted electronically through the NFA’s Online Registration System (ORS). Firm applicants must provide detailed information regarding their ownership structure, principals, business activities, disciplinary history, and financial condition. Individuals seeking registration as Associated Persons must submit personal registration information, fingerprint cards, employment history, and evidence of satisfying applicable proficiency requirements.
Depending on the registration category, applicants may also be required to submit supporting agreements, financial statements, and other documentation requested by the NFA during the review process. Incomplete applications, inconsistent disclosures, or outdated financial information frequently result in avoidable delays and additional requests for information.
Step 6: Respond to the NFA Review Process
Once an application has been submitted, the NFA conducts a comprehensive review to determine whether the applicant satisfies the statutory and regulatory requirements for registration. As part of this review, the NFA evaluates background information for principals and Associated Persons, reviews financial documentation, and may request copies of compliance policies or additional supporting materials. Applicants should respond promptly to follow-up questions or requests for clarification throughout the review process.
The time required for approval varies depending on the complexity of the application. IB applications are often completed within several weeks to a few months, whereas FCM applications generally require a longer review period because of their greater financial and operational complexity.
Step 7: Transition from Registration to Operations
Once registered, firms are expected to operate in accordance with the supervisory procedures, financial controls, and compliance programs described in their application materials. Maintaining regulatory compliance becomes an integral part of day-to-day business operations and requires continuous attention as the firm grows and regulatory expectations evolve.
The first year of operations is particularly important, as firms establish internal processes, reporting routines, and supervisory practices that will support long-term compliance and position the business for sustainable growth within the rapidly evolving prediction markets industry.
Conclusion
Prediction markets are rapidly emerging as a significant segment of the regulated derivatives industry, creating new opportunities for financial institutions, technology companies, entrepreneurs, and market participants seeking to develop innovative products and services. As this market continues to evolve, firms that establish a strong regulatory foundation within the framework established by the CEA, the CFTC, and the NFA will be best positioned to adapt to changing requirements and capitalize on future growth.
Firms that devote the necessary time to developing sound supervisory procedures, meeting financial requirements, and implementing effective compliance programs are better equipped to build sustainable businesses while maintaining the confidence of regulators, customers, and business partners. Whether you are evaluating the appropriate registration category, preparing your application, or developing the compliance infrastructure needed to support your business, Tölt Strategies, LLC provides practical guidance throughout the registration process and beyond. Our professionals assist firms with regulatory strategy, CFTC and NFA registration, compliance program development, and ongoing regulatory support tailored to the unique needs of participants in the prediction markets industry.
Have more questions? Tölt Strategies, LLC is here to help.
Disclaimer: This publication is provided for informational purposes only and should not be construed as legal, accounting, or regulatory advice.
July 25, 2026: Chapter 21, Prediction Markets, of the 2026 Edition of Regulation of Swaps and Security-Based Swaps in the United States
Questions? If you’re ready to navigate your crypto journey schedule a consultation today.